Hamas Accepts Disarmament Framework; Israel Signals Skepticism
US President Donald Trump announced that the US-led Board of Peace reached a deal for the phased disarmament of Hamas in Gaza and gradual Israeli withdrawal, which Hamas confirmed it had accepted. Israel's government had not officially responded and key officials voiced deep skepticism, while both sides outlined conflicting conditions on sequencing.
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides, MBFC, Ad Fontes Media. Ratings are cited, not the product's own verdict.
The report
US President Donald Trump announced that the US-led Board of Peace reached a deal for the disarmament of Hamas in Gaza and the withdrawal of Israeli forces. Trump described the Hamas disarmament decision as "a monumental step toward lasting peace and security." Hamas announced it accepted the disarmament framework, agreeing to lay down its arms as part of a deal to end the war with Israel.

Israel had not yet officially responded to the plan at the time of reporting, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had not publicly commented. Israeli government officials expressed deep skepticism about Hamas's willingness to actually disarm. Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir dismissed the plan as "unacceptable" to Israel.
The roadmap calls for a process to inventory and store heavy weapons, military production sites, weapons depots, and tunnels. Underground tunnel networks, weapons stores, and manufacturing sites would be mapped and destroyed. The disarmament process is described as gradual and phased, with an implementation schedule to be prepared within 14 days. The surrender of heavy weapons and decommissioning of tunnels could take between 200 and 350 days.
Hamas dissolved its government in Gaza and agreed to hand over power to the Palestinian National Committee, described as a group of independent technocrats. Trump's plan envisions a new technocratic Palestinian government and the arrival of an International Stabilisation Force to safeguard Gaza alongside Palestinian police. Hundreds of new Palestinian police recruits have already been trained in Egypt and Jordan.
Israel currently controls more than 53% of Gaza based on the October ceasefire terms, with reports that the Yellow Line — which demarcates the area Israel controls — has been moved westward so Israel controls more than 60% of the strip.
Center-left outlets characterized the disarmament process as conditional on Israeli compliance. The BBC and Guardian reported that the disarmament process is contingent on Israel meeting its commitments under the October ceasefire agreement. This framing emphasizes Hamas's position that its obligations depend on Israeli actions.
Multiple outlets across the political spectrum reported Israeli officials' insistence that there will be no Israeli withdrawal from the Yellow Line before Hamas is disarmed. Trump said at a Friday cabinet meeting at Camp David that Israel is "very happy" about the agreement and "helped us" with it, but offered no clarity on the sequence of Hamas disarmament and Israeli withdrawal.
Only the BBC reported Hamas's self-characterization that it negotiated "responsibly and positively" and reached "national consensus" among Palestinian factions. This language appears in center-left coverage but was not reported by other outlets across the spectrum.
The BBC, which reported access to a four-page phased disarmament plan, described the deal as based on a 15-point roadmap published by the US-led Board of Peace. The roadmap specifies that no weapons shall be transferred or handed over to Israel or to any non-Palestinian party. The Palestinian National Committee has not yet entered Gaza and has been working from Cairo.
Euronews, citing US and Board of Peace officials, reported that the Gaza police force's police weapons would be handed over within approximately two weeks, but that this initial phase does not include Hamas's heavy weaponry or the vast majority of Hamas militants. This distinction between police weapons and heavy weapons in the initial handover appears only in center reporting.
The BBC reported that Israel's cabinet approved approximately 200 international troops from "friendly countries" entering Gaza as part of the International Stabilisation Force, though the force has not yet been deployed. This specific detail about cabinet approval and deployment status appears only in center-left coverage.
The Guardian identified confusion over which entity Hamas would hand its heavy weapons to: Trump said the Board of Peace, while officials announcing the deal said it would be Palestinian authorities, and Hamas official Ghazi Hamad told Reuters it would be the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza. This three-way discrepancy in stated weapons recipients was reported only by center-left outlets.
The Guardian reported that an Israeli official told Reuters that Israel demands complete disarmament of Hamas including removal of weapons from Gaza and complete demilitarization of the strip as a precondition, and that the plan under discussion does not satisfy these demands. An Israeli source told AFP that Israel will not withdraw from the Yellow Line until Hamas undergoes "genuine disarmament." Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon said "cosmetic solutions" would not work and Hamas must "actually" disarm, while also saying Israel is "looking forward to implementing" the plan.
Euronews cited an unnamed US official stating that Israel had been consulted at every step of the negotiation and was not being asked to do more than what it initially committed to under Trump's 20-point plan. This characterization of Israeli consultation and commitments appears only in center reporting.
The BBC reported that the plan's annex requires Israeli forces to withdraw to the agreed Yellow Line within 24 hours of Israeli government approval and specifies they should not return as long as Hamas complies with the agreement. The BBC also reported that Israel is displacing families and expanding its Yellow Line temporary control area deeper into Gaza territory, and continues to build land barriers. This framing of Israeli actions appears only in center-left coverage.
Hamas and Israel hold directly contradictory positions on the sequencing of disarmament and withdrawal. Hamas characterizes its heavy weapons handover as contingent on Israel ending all hostilities and withdrawing forces from Gaza. Israel characterizes complete Hamas disarmament as a precondition that must occur before any Israeli withdrawal. This dispute over which action must come first is reported across outlets spanning center-left, center, and center-right sources.
What the coverage shows
The 9 outlets behind this story
Bias ratings sourced from AllSides and Media Bias/Fact Check. Ownership shown where disclosed.